Kansas Municipals v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

D.C. Circuit

Kansas Municipals v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

5 F. App'x 2

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided February 26, 2001·No. No. 99-1525·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

This petition for review was heard on the record from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the briefs and arguments of counsel. The issues have been accorded full consideration by the Court and occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). Petitioners have failed to show that the agency action was “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” See 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A). It is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the petition for review is denied.

The clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 41(a)(1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

This petition for review was heard on the record from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the briefs and arguments of counsel. The issues have been accorded full consideration by the Court and occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). Petitioners have failed to show that the agency action was “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” See 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A). It is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the petition for review is denied.

The clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 41(a)(1).

Kansas Municipals v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 5 F. App'x 2 (D.C. Cir. 2001).

Pincite

5 F. App'x 2 (Kansas Municipals v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related