Kansas & Gulp Short Line R. R. v. Patrons' Co-operative Ass'n

2 Wilson 449
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 10, 1884·No. No. 1766·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 502. jRes adjudicata; judgment on demurrer is, when. Appellee sued appellant in the county court at the January term, 1884, for precisely the same cause of action as that stated in the petition in this suit. In that suit a general demurrer was sustained to the petition, and appellee gave notice of appeal from said judgment, but subsequently withdrew the same, and the judgment upon the demurrer remained in full force. To the present action, appellant pleaded the said judgment on demurrer as res adjudicata, and introduced in evidence the pleadings and judgment in said former suit, and requested the court to charge the jury in relation thereto, in substance, that if they found the facts stated in the plea to be true, they would find for the defendant. The court refused the charge, and the jury found for the plaintiff. Held, the plea presented a bar to this action, and the requested charge should have been given. [Dixon v. Zadek, 59 Tex. 531; Hale v. McComas, 59 Tex. 484; Nichols v. Dibrell, 60 Tex. 539; Graham v. Vining, 1 Tex. 669.]

Eeversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kansas & Gulp Short Line R. R. v. Patrons' Co-operative Ass'n, 2 Wilson 449 (Tex. Ct. App. 1884).

2 Wilson 449 (Kansas & Gulp Short Line R. R. v. Patrons' Co-operative Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Graham v. Vining
1 Tex. 669 (Texas Supreme Court, 1846)
Hale v. McComas
59 Tex. 484 (Texas Supreme Court, 1883)
Norton v. Cantagrel
60 Tex. 538 (Texas Supreme Court, 1883)