Kansas Farmers Union Royalty Co. v. Shaffer

Supreme Court

Kansas Farmers Union Royalty Co. v. Shaffer

303 U.S. 623, 58 S. Ct. 742

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 7, 1938

DocketNo. 366

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 303 U.S. 623 (Kansas Farmers Union Royalty Co. v. Shaffer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kansas Farmers Union Royalty Co. v. Shaffer, 303 U.S. 623, 58 S. Ct. 742 (1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

As it appears, after hearing argument, that there is no properly presented federal question, the motion of the appellants to reinstate the case for further consideration is denied and the appeal is dismissed. Clarke v. McDade, 165 U. S. 168, 172; Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. McDonald, 214 U. S. 191, 193; Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 343; Witzelberg v. Cincinnati, 302 U. S. 635.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

As it appears, after hearing argument, that there is no properly presented federal question, the motion of the appellants to reinstate the case for further consideration is denied and the appeal is dismissed. Clarke v. McDade, 165 U. S. 168, 172; Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. McDonald, 214 U. S. 191, 193; Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 343; Witzelberg v. Cincinnati, 302 U. S. 635.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

303 U.S. 623, 58 S. Ct. 742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kansas-farmers-union-royalty-co-v-shaffer-scotus-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack