Kansas Farmers Union Royalty Co. v. Shaffer

Supreme Court

Kansas Farmers Union Royalty Co. v. Shaffer

303 U.S. 623, 58 S. Ct. 742

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 7, 1938·No. No. 366·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

As it appears, after hearing argument, that there is no properly presented federal question, the motion of the appellants to reinstate the case for further consideration is denied and the appeal is dismissed. Clarke v. McDade, 165 U. S. 168, 172; Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. McDonald, 214 U. S. 191, 193; Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 343; Witzelberg v. Cincinnati, 302 U. S. 635.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

As it appears, after hearing argument, that there is no properly presented federal question, the motion of the appellants to reinstate the case for further consideration is denied and the appeal is dismissed. Clarke v. McDade, 165 U. S. 168, 172; Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. McDonald, 214 U. S. 191, 193; Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 343; Witzelberg v. Cincinnati, 302 U. S. 635.

Kansas Farmers Union Royalty Co. v. Shaffer, 303 U.S. 623, 58 S. Ct. 742 (1938).

Pincite

303 U.S. 623 (Kansas Farmers Union Royalty Co. v. Shaffer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related