Kansas Farmers' Union Royalty Co. v. Hushaw
307 U.S. 615, 59 S. Ct. 1046
This text of 307 U.S. 615 (Kansas Farmers' Union Royalty Co. v. Hushaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kansas Farmers' Union Royalty Co. v. Hushaw, 307 U.S. 615, 59 S. Ct. 1046 (1939).
Opinion
The appeal is dismissed” for want1-of a substantial federal question. (1) Jackson v. Lamphire, 3 Pet. 280, 289-290; Vance v. Vance, 108 U. S. 514, 520; (2) Davis v. Mills, 194 U. S. 451, 456-457; Montoya v. Gonzales, 232 U. S. 375; (3) Bell’s Gap Railroad Co. v. Pennsylvania, 134 U. S. 232, 237; Ohio Oil Co. v. Conway, 281 U. S. 146, 159.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jackson v. Lamphire
28 U.S. 280 (Supreme Court, 1830)
Vance v. Vance
108 U.S. 514 (Supreme Court, 1883)
Bell's Gap Railroad v. Pennsylvania
134 U.S. 232 (Supreme Court, 1890)
Davis v. Mills
194 U.S. 451 (Supreme Court, 1904)
Montoya v. Gonzalez
232 U.S. 375 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Ohio Oil Co. v. Conway
281 U.S. 146 (Supreme Court, 1930)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
307 U.S. 615, 59 S. Ct. 1046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kansas-farmers-union-royalty-co-v-hushaw-scotus-1939.