Kansas City Star Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations

217 N.W.2d 666, 62 Wis. 2d 783, 60 Wis. 2d 591
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided May 8, 1974·No. No. 259·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

The following opinion was filed May 8,1974.

Per Curiam

(on motion for rehearing). The employment contract did not spell out the terms of the right of [784] the union to withdraw its termination notice, nor the existence of a right of the union to reinstate that notice prior to the ending date of the contract. In the absence of a specific provision in the contract as to the right to withdraw a termination notice, the department found that the union withdrew its termination notice and the department further found that as to the subsequent layoffs there was then no bona fide labor dispute in progress. These findings were supported by credible evidence as discussed in our original opinion.

We do not reach the question now raised for the first time by the employer asserting estoppel as to either the “department” or the union. Estoppel was not asserted before the department nor was there any point made of it either in the record before the department or in the trial court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kansas City Star Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations, 217 N.W.2d 666, 62 Wis. 2d 783, 60 Wis. 2d 591 (Wis. 1974).

217 N.W.2d 666 (Kansas City Star Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lee-Norse Co. v. Rutledge
291 S.E.2d 477 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1982)
De Leeuw v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations
238 N.W.2d 706 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1976)
McGraw-Edison Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations
221 N.W.2d 677 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1974)
Fish v. White Equipment Sales & Service, Inc.
221 N.W.2d 864 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1974)