Home/Supreme Court of Missouri/Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs Railroad v. St. Joseph Terminal Railroad

Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs Railroad v. St. Joseph Terminal Railroad

97 Mo. 457
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedOctober 15, 1888
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 97 Mo. 457 (Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs Railroad v. St. Joseph Terminal Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs Railroad v. St. Joseph Terminal Railroad, 97 Mo. 457 (Mo. 1888).

Opinion

Brace, J.

This is an appeal from the decree of the circuit court of Buchanan county enjoining the defendant from entering upon, or interfering with plaintiff’s several railroad tracks as now constructed and operated on, over and across Fourth street in the city of St. Joseph.

The defendant, at the time of the filing of the petition, was engaged in constructing its track on Fourth street, was approaching the tracks of plaintiff, and purposed crossing them, claiming the right to do so by virtue of an ordinance of the city of St. Joseph duly passed and approved January 7, 1887, granting it “the privilege of laying down, constructing, using and maintaining forever along Fourth street a single railroad track from the south line of Sacramento street to the north line of Lafayette street.”

The accompanying map or diagram represents the relative situation of the grounds of the contestants, the tracks of plaintiff as established and operated, and the points of their crossing by the proposed track of the defendant, the plaintiff’s tracks are in yellow, and the defendant’s in red.

It will be observed from the map, that the defendant proposes to cross six of the plaintiff’s tracks on Fourth street, that at the points of crossing, the plaintiff is the owner of the property abutting said street on each' side thereof. Prior to September, 1878, the plaintiff was the absolute owner also of the strip, of ground between its said abutting premises designated on the map as Fourth street, with its several tracks as located thereon, and was operating the said several tracks in its business as a common carrier of passengers and freight in connection with its tracks on its adjoining property of which the street then formed a part. At the September term, 1878, of the circuit court of Buchanan county, in a pro ceeding instituted by the city of St. Joseph against the

[0]*0

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Tennessee v. Eddins
516 S.W.2d 76 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1974)
Branch v. Branch
249 S.W.2d 581 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1952)
Seibel-Suessdorf Copper & Iron Manufacturing Co. v. Manufacturers' Railway Co.
130 S.W. 288 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1910)
South East & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Evansville & Mt. Vernon Electric Railway Co.
82 N.E. 765 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1907)
Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Bowling Green Ry. Co.
63 S.W. 4 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1901)
Southern Railway Co. v. Atlanta Railway & Power Co.
51 L.R.A. 125 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)
Birmingham Traction Co. v. Birmingham Railway & Electric Co.
119 Ala. 137 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1898)
Stephenson v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
68 Mo. App. 642 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1897)
Union Elevator Co. v. Kansas City Suburban Belt Railroad
36 S.W. 1071 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1896)
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Steel
66 N.W. 830 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)
Grand Avenue Railway Co. v. People's Railway Co.
33 S.W. 472 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1895)
Lockwood v. Wabash Railroad
24 L.R.A. 516 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1894)
Kansas City Suburban Belt Railroad v. Kansas City, St. Louis & Chicago Railroad
24 S.W. 478 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1893)
Henry Gaus & Sons Manufacturing Co. v. St. Louis, Keokuk & Northwestern Railroad
20 S.W. 658 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1892)
St. Louis Transfer Railway Co. v. St. Louis Merchants Bridge Terminal Railway Co.
20 S.W. 319 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1892)
Gates v. Kansas City Bridge & Terminal Railway Co.
19 S.W. 957 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 Mo. 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kansas-city-st-joseph-council-bluffs-railroad-v-st-joseph-terminal-mo-1888.