Kansas City & Southwestern Railroad v. Orr
This text of 41 Kan. 70 (Kansas City & Southwestern Railroad v. Orr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment in this case must be affirmed. First: As to the competency of opinion evidence given by [71]*71farmers with respect to the value of land in their neighborhood, see as follows: K. C. & S. W. Rld. Co. v. Ehret, ante, p. 22; same case, 20 Pac. Rep. 538, and authorities there cited. K. C. & S. W. Rld. Co. v. Baird, just decided; Lewis on Eminent Domain, §§ 435, 437, and cases there cited.
Second: With respect to the special interrogatories asked to be submitted, no error was committed and no exception taken.
Third: The instruction given with reference to the measure of damages, was correct. (L. & W. Rld. Co. v. Ross, 40 Kas. 598; same case, 20 Pac. Rep. 197.)
Fourth: The instruction given with respect to farm-crossings was correct. The K. C. & S. W. Rld. Co. v. Baird, ante; K. C. & S. W. Rld. Co. v. Ehret, ante, p. 22.
The judgment of the court below will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 Kan. 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kansas-city-southwestern-railroad-v-orr-kan-1889.