Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Love

1909 OK 31, 100 P. 22, 23 Okla. 224, 1909 Okla. LEXIS 342
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedFebruary 9, 1909
Docket606
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 1909 OK 31 (Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Love) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Love, 1909 OK 31, 100 P. 22, 23 Okla. 224, 1909 Okla. LEXIS 342 (Okla. 1909).

Opinion

Williams, C. J.

(after stating the facts as above). The following questions are raised in this case: (1) May an appeal be taken from a final order of the Corporation Commission on a record certified in accordance with the provisions of section 22, art. 9 (section 234, Bunn’s Ed.; page 259, Snyder’s Ed.), of the Constitution of Oklahoma? (2) When shall a supersedeas be 'issued after the time prescribed by the commission in its order for a certain facility to be furnished has expired?

The first question has been decided in the affirmative in the case of the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, Plaintiff v. J. E .Love, Chairman, and the Corporation Commission of the State of Oklahoma, Defendants (No. 553, recently decided by this- court) ante, p., 99 Pac. 1081.

The question as to the granting of a supersedeas will -be re *226 served until the record has been properly certified to this court under the seal of the Corporation Commission by its chairman'.-

The order as to the certificate to be made by the chairman of the commission will he awarded as prayed for, but not issued at this time. If the chairman of the commission fails to make such certificate, under the seal of the commission, and such written statement, and transmit the same to the clerk of this court, in accordance with such request, upon advice of our conclusious, the plaintiff may renew its motion.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. State
1937 OK 461 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1937)
Lone Star Gas Co. v. Corporation Commission
1934 OK 396 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1934)
Pressure Oil & Gas Co. v. Tri-City Gas Co.
1925 OK 334 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1925)
Muskogee Gas & Electric Co. v. State
1920 OK 6 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1920)
St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Miller
1912 OK 222 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Williams
1910 OK 52 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1910)
Midland Valley R. Co. v. State
1909 OK 252 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1909 OK 31, 100 P. 22, 23 Okla. 224, 1909 Okla. LEXIS 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kansas-city-southern-ry-co-v-love-okla-1909.