Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Hooper

Supreme Court

Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Hooper

278 U.S. 563, 49 S. Ct. 35, 73 L. Ed. 507, 1928 U.S. LEXIS 15

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 29, 1928

DocketNo. 43

StatusPublished

This text of 278 U.S. 563 (Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Hooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Hooper, 278 U.S. 563, 49 S. Ct. 35, 73 L. Ed. 507, 1928 U.S. LEXIS 15 (1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Reversed on the authority of Montana National Bank v. [564]*564Yellowstone County, 276 U. S. 499; Oklahoma Operating Co. v. Love, 252 U. S. 331; St. Louis Iron Mountain & Southern Ry. v. Williams, 251 U. S. 63; Wadley Southern Ry. v. Georgia, 235 U. S. 651; Ex Parte Young, 209 U. S. 123.

Mr. Frank H. Moore, with whom Messrs. A. F. Smith, James B. McDonough, and Samuel W. Mqore were on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. E. C. Lakéríor respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Reversed on the authority of Montana National Bank v. [564]*564Yellowstone County, 276 U. S. 499; Oklahoma Operating Co. v. Love, 252 U. S. 331; St. Louis Iron Mountain & Southern Ry. v. Williams, 251 U. S. 63; Wadley Southern Ry. v. Georgia, 235 U. S. 651; Ex Parte Young, 209 U. S. 123.

Mr. Frank H. Moore, with whom Messrs. A. F. Smith, James B. McDonough, and Samuel W. Mqore were on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. E. C. Lakéríor respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 U.S. 563, 49 S. Ct. 35, 73 L. Ed. 507, 1928 U.S. LEXIS 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kansas-city-southern-ry-co-v-hooper-scotus-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack