Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co. v. Texas

Supreme Court

Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co. v. Texas

241 U.S. 650, 60 L. Ed. 1221, 36 S. Ct. 553, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1806

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedApril 24, 1916

DocketNo. 188

StatusPublished

This text of 241 U.S. 650 (Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co. v. Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co. v. Texas, 241 U.S. 650, 60 L. Ed. 1221, 36 S. Ct. 553, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1806 (1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for Want of jurisdiction upon the authority of:

(1) Jones v. Montague, 194 U. S. 147; Richardson v. McChesney, 218 U. S. 487; Stearns v. Wood, 236 U. S. 75.

(2) Kansas City Star Co. v. Julian, 215 U. S. 589; Forbes v. State Council of Virginia, 216 U. S. 396-399; St. Louis & San Francisco Railway v. Shepherd, 240 U. S. 240.

(3) Henkel v. Cincinnati, 177 U. S. 170; Fullerton v. Texas, 196 U. S. 192, 194; Allen v. Arguimbau, 198 U. S. 149, 156; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. R. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 55.

(4) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469, 471. See Pinney v. Nelson, 183 U. S. 144, 147; Abilene National Bank v. Dolley, 228 U. S. 1, 5; Lake Shore & Michigan So. Ry. v. Ohio, 173 U. S. 285, 289, et seq.; Cincinnati, Indianapolis & W. Ry. v. Connersville, 218 U. S. 336; Missouri Pacific Railway v. Kansas, 216 U. S. 262, 283 et seq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI