Kansas City, Lawrence & Southwestern Railway Co. v. Richolson

31 Kan. 28
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided July 15, 1883·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The defendant in error (plaintiff below) filed an amended bill of particulars in the district court, in the absence of the railway company and without notice to it, and the railway company made no appearance upon the trial. Under the amended petition, the court increased the claim of the attorney’s fees from fifteen dollars to thirty, and rendered judgment accordingly. Within the following cases, the judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings: L. L. & G. Rld. Co. v. Van Riper, 19 Kas. 317; St. L. & S. F. Rly. Co. v. McReynolds, 24 id. 368; Same v. Ellis, 25 id. 108; A. T. & S. F. Rld. Co. v. Combs, 25 id. 729.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kansas City, Lawrence & Southwestern Railway Co. v. Richolson, 31 Kan. 28 (kan 1883).

31 Kan. 28 (Kansas City, Lawrence & Southwestern Railway Co. v. Richolson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Felts v. Sugg
207 P.2d 460 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1949)
Raymer v. Comley Lumber Co.
1934 OK 688 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1934)
Avery v. Jayhawker Gasoline Co.
1924 OK 423 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)