Kansas City, Lawrence & Southwestern Railway Co. v. Richolson
This text of 31 Kan. 28 (Kansas City, Lawrence & Southwestern Railway Co. v. Richolson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant in error (plaintiff below) filed an amended bill of particulars in the district court, in the absence of the railway company and without notice to it, and the railway company made no appearance upon the trial. Under the amended petition, the court increased the claim of the attorney’s fees from fifteen dollars to thirty, and rendered judgment accordingly. Within the following cases, the judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings: L. L. & G. Rld. Co. v. Van Riper, 19 Kas. 317; St. L. & S. F. Rly. Co. v. McReynolds, 24 id. 368; Same v. Ellis, 25 id. 108; A. T. & S. F. Rld. Co. v. Combs, 25 id. 729.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 Kan. 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kansas-city-lawrence-southwestern-railway-co-v-richolson-kan-1883.