Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. Dalton

72 P. 209, 66 Kan. 799, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 184
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedApril 11, 1903
DocketNo. 13,057
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 72 P. 209 (Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. Dalton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. Dalton, 72 P. 209, 66 Kan. 799, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 184 (kan 1903).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This proceeding in error is brought to reverse a judgment obtained against the railroad company for negligence in carrying defendant in error, in company with her sister, Jennie Dalton, beyond her point of destination, compelling her to alight from the train and return to [800]*800her station upon a freight-train in the night-time. The facts are identical with those stated in Railroad Co. v. Dalton, 65 Kan. 661, 70 Pac. 645.

We shall consider but one question. This arises upon the instructions to the jury. The court did not state the issues to the jury fully, but sent the pleadings in the case to the jury to ascertain the issues. The petition is voluminous, covering six pages of typewritten matter. The instructions in this case seem to be very similar in verbiage with those given in Railroad Co. v. Eagan, 64 Kan. 421, 67 Pac. 887. Upon the authority of that case and the case of Stevens v. Maxwell, 65 Kan. 835, 70 Pac. 873, the judgment must be reversed.

Other errors are assigned, but as they are of such nature as will probably not arise upon a retrial, they are not now considered.

The judgment is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Voter v. Newsalt
225 N.W. 74 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1929)
Davis v. Heiner
181 P. 587 (Utah Supreme Court, 1919)
Williamson v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.
146 P. 316 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1915)
Aaron v. Missouri & Kansas Telephone Co.
114 P. 211 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1911)
H. R. Kamm & Co. v. W. E. Sloan & Co.
83 P. 1103 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 P. 209, 66 Kan. 799, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kansas-city-fort-scott-memphis-railroad-v-dalton-kan-1903.