Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulp Railroad v. Frazier
This text of 23 Kan. 698 (Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulp Railroad v. Frazier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It sufficiently appearing from the testimony that Frank Fargo, upon whom the notice in this case was served, was station and ticket agent of plaintiff in error (defendant below), and that being the only question presented by counsel, the judgment will be affirmed, on the authority of K. P. Rly. Co. v. Ball, 19 Kas. 535; C. B. Rld. Co. v. Ingram, 20 Kas. 66; Union Trust Co. v. Kendall, 20 Kas. 515; Laws 1874, ch. 94, §3, p. 144.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 Kan. 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kansas-city-fort-scott-gulp-railroad-v-frazier-kan-1880.