Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulp Railroad v. Frazier
23 Kan. 698
Opinion
It sufficiently appearing from the testimony that Frank Fargo, upon whom the notice in this case was served, was station and ticket agent of plaintiff in error (defendant below), and that being the only question presented by counsel, the judgment will be affirmed, on the authority of K. P. Rly. Co. v. Ball, 19 Kas. 535; C. B. Rld. Co. v. Ingram, 20 Kas. 66; Union Trust Co. v. Kendall, 20 Kas. 515; Laws 1874, ch. 94, §3, p. 144.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulp Railroad v. Frazier, 23 Kan. 698 (kan 1880).
23 Kan. 698 (Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulp Railroad v. Frazier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. Ball
19 Kan. 535 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1878)
Central Branch Railroad v. Ingram
20 Kan. 66 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1878)
Union Trust Co. v. Kendall
20 Kan. 515 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1878)