Kaniuk v. Dry Dock, East Broadway & Battery Railroad

96 N.Y.S. 129
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 29, 1905
StatusPublished

This text of 96 N.Y.S. 129 (Kaniuk v. Dry Dock, East Broadway & Battery Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kaniuk v. Dry Dock, East Broadway & Battery Railroad, 96 N.Y.S. 129 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Opinion

SCOTT, P. J.

Unless we are prepared to hold that the mere fact that an accident happened fastens liability upon the defendant, this judgment cannot stand. There is absolutely no evidence of negligence. It was also manifest error to allow anything for the hire of a horse to replace the injured animal. There is no evidence of what plaintiff paid, or that he paid anything. All we have is his brother’s testimony that he “usually” charged $2 a day.

Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 N.Y.S. 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaniuk-v-dry-dock-east-broadway-battery-railroad-nyappterm-1905.