Kanisky v. Freedman
This text of 10 A.D.2d 620 (Kanisky v. Freedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously reversed, on the facts, on the ground of excessiveness of the verdict and a new trial ordered, with costs to defendant-appellant, unless the plaintiff stipulates to reduce the verdict to the sum of $40,000, in which event the judgment, as so modified, is unanimously affirmed, with costs'to defendant-appellant. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, M. M. Frank and Stevens, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 A.D.2d 620, 196 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kanisky-v-freedman-nyappdiv-1960.