Kangarlou Vs. Cici'S Enter., Lp
This text of Kangarlou Vs. Cici'S Enter., Lp (Kangarlou Vs. Cici'S Enter., Lp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
SAEID KANGARLOU, No. 79766 Appellant, vs. CICI'S ENTERPRISE, LP; CICI'S PIZZA; F LED BILL BADD; AND BILLY M&M e‘iroo, INCORPORATED, NOV Res • ondents. ELT} CtrJRT CL
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a ruling by the alternative dispute resolution commissioner on an objection to arbitrator's bill for fees and costs. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Nancy L. Allf, Judge. Review of the notice of appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. This court may only consider appeals that are authorized by statute or court rule. Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013). No statute or court rule allows an appeal to this court from a ruling by the alternative dispute resolution commissioner on an objection to arbitrator's bill for fees and costs. Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
J.
J. Cadish cc: Hon. Nancy L. Allf, District Judge Saeid Kangarlou Hawkins Melendrez, P.C. Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kangarlou Vs. Cici'S Enter., Lp, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kangarlou-vs-cicis-enter-lp-nev-2019.