Kangarlou v. Locklear

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA Saeid Sam Kangarlou, Case No.: 2:18-cv-02286-JAD-BNW 4 Plaintiff Order Adopting Report and v. Recommendation and Denying Joint Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement 6|| Alton Al Locklear, et al., [ECF Nos. 83, 86] 7 Defendants 8 The magistrate judge has considered the defendants’ joint motion to enforce an agreement to settle this matter and recommends that I deny it because there was no meeting of minds.' The deadline for any party to object to that recommendation was August 25, 2022, no party filed anything or asked to extend the deadline to do so. “[N]o review is required of 12||a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”* Having reviewed report and recommendation, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do. 14 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 15|| Recommendation [ECF No. 86] is ADOPTED in its entirety. The Joint Motion to Enforce 16} Settlement Agreement [ECF No. 83] is DENIED. M7 “4 QZ 18 US. District Fedge Tomboy Dorsey Dated: August 26, 2022 19 20 21]! ddd ECF No. 83. 22 2 Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).