Kang Jai Ass'n v. Poon Gee Datt
279 A.D. 872, 110 N.Y.S.2d 424, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5154
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 18, 1952·Published
Opinion
Where a complaint states any cause of action, it may not be dismissed on a motion of this character. (Cornehlsen v. Dudensing, 270 App. Div. 1037.) Here the plaintiffs are the corporations and may assert a cause of action for an accounting. (General Corporation Law, §§ 60, 61.) On its face the complaint does not show that the institution of the action has been without proper authorization. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Wenzel, MaeCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kang Jai Ass'n v. Poon Gee Datt, 279 A.D. 872, 110 N.Y.S.2d 424, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5154 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).
279 A.D. 872 (Kang Jai Ass'n v. Poon Gee Datt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cornehlsen v. Dudensing
270 A.D. 1037 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)