Kanes v. Merchants & Mechanics Banking & Loan Co.

168 S.E. 560, 176 Ga. 634, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 239
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 28, 1933
DocketNo. 9085
StatusPublished

This text of 168 S.E. 560 (Kanes v. Merchants & Mechanics Banking & Loan Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kanes v. Merchants & Mechanics Banking & Loan Co., 168 S.E. 560, 176 Ga. 634, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 239 (Ga. 1933).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

As a general rule, all parties, whether plaintiffs or defendants, in the superior courts, whether at law or in equity, may at the first term, as matter of right, amend their pleadings in all respects, whether in matter of form or of substance, provided there is enough in the pleadings to amend by. Civil Code, § 5681. Under this rule as applied in Wood v. Bewick Lumber Co., 103 Ga. 235 (29 S. E. 820), the plaintiffs had the right to amend the petition by striking therefrom the allegations in paragraphs 19, 20, 21, and 22, as stated in the proposed amendment, and it was erroneous to disallow the amendment. On another hearing the judge in ruling upon the general demurrer will consider the petition as amended.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. Morris Maclcs and Robert T. Ffurd, for plaintiffs. Alston, Alston, Foster $ Moise, Dorsey & Shelton, and Ralph H. Pharr, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wood v. Bewick Lumber Co.
29 S.E. 820 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 S.E. 560, 176 Ga. 634, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kanes-v-merchants-mechanics-banking-loan-co-ga-1933.