Kanellos & Co. v. Kavadas

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Kanellos & Co. v. Kavadas

209 S.E.2d 232, 132 Ga. App. 787, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1822

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 17, 1974

Docket49271

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 209 S.E.2d 232 (Kanellos & Co. v. Kavadas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kanellos & Co. v. Kavadas, 209 S.E.2d 232, 132 Ga. App. 787, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1822 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

The direction of a verdict is proper only where there [788]*788is no conflict in the evidence as to any material issue and the evidence introduced, with all reasonable deductions therefrom, shall demand a particular verdict. CPA § 50 (a) (Code Ann. § 81A-150 (a)). In this complaint to recover for services rendered by a real estate broker in connection with the transfer of a lease, the evidence at trial was in conflict as to whether plaintiff rendered any services to defendant. Therefore, no error was committed by the trial judge in denying plaintiffs motion for directed verdict and entering judgment for defendant upon the verdict of the jury in the latter’s favor.

Argued May 6, 1974 Decided September 17, 1974 Rehearing denied October 2, 1974. Louis F. McDonald, for appellant. Nick G. Lambros, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian and Clark, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, Chief Judge.

The direction of a verdict is proper only where there [788]*788is no conflict in the evidence as to any material issue and the evidence introduced, with all reasonable deductions therefrom, shall demand a particular verdict. CPA § 50 (a) (Code Ann. § 81A-150 (a)). In this complaint to recover for services rendered by a real estate broker in connection with the transfer of a lease, the evidence at trial was in conflict as to whether plaintiff rendered any services to defendant. Therefore, no error was committed by the trial judge in denying plaintiffs motion for directed verdict and entering judgment for defendant upon the verdict of the jury in the latter’s favor.

Argued May 6, 1974 Decided September 17, 1974 Rehearing denied October 2, 1974. Louis F. McDonald, for appellant. Nick G. Lambros, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian and Clark, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 S.E.2d 232, 132 Ga. App. 787, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kanellos-co-v-kavadas-gactapp-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack