Kane v. Young

543 So. 2d 793, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1036, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2239, 1989 WL 39600
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 25, 1989
DocketNos. 88-773, 88-909, 88-910, 89-63 and 89-64
StatusPublished

This text of 543 So. 2d 793 (Kane v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kane v. Young, 543 So. 2d 793, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1036, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2239, 1989 WL 39600 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Daniel H. Kane, M.D., appeals from a final judgment, entered in favor of appellees, Joyce Young and Burton Young. Appellees Joyce Young and Burton Young cross-appeal and claim the record does not support the jury’s finding of ninety percent comparative negligence against Joyce Young, nor does it support the final judgments entered on jury verdicts in favor of cross-appellees, Hal Maragh, M.D. and G. Brest Corporation, d/b/a White House Inn. Neither appellant Kane nor cross-appellants, Joyce and Burton Young, have demonstrated error in the entry of the aforementioned judgments. Accordingly, we affirm.

We reverse the final judgment awarding attorney’s fees, pursuant to section 768.56, Florida Statutes (1983), to G. Brest Corporation, d/b/a White House Inn. See Gershuny v. Martin McFall Messenger Anesthesia Professional Association, 539 So.2d 1131 (Fla.1989).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gershuny v. MARTIN McFALL MESS. AN. PA
539 So. 2d 1131 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
543 So. 2d 793, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1036, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2239, 1989 WL 39600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kane-v-young-fladistctapp-1989.