Kane v. Quigley

Ohio Court of Appeals

Kane v. Quigley

29 Ohio Law Rep. 68

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 29, 1964

Docket38584 and 38585

StatusPublished

This text of 29 Ohio Law Rep. 68 (Kane v. Quigley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kane v. Quigley, 29 Ohio Law Rep. 68 (Ohio Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga Comity.

O’Neill, Judge.

A petition by a minor child, alleging that a defendant wrongfully induced the plaintiff’s father to abandon his family thereby (1) depriving the plaintiff of his father’s affection, companionship and guidance and (2) bringing unwanted attention and unwarranted publicity causing embarrassment, humiliation and loss of social standing to the plaintiff, is subject to demurrer on the ground that it fails to state a cause of action.

Judgments affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, Griffith and Herbert, JJ., concur. Gibson, J., dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga Comity.

O’Neill, Judge.

A petition by a minor child, alleging that a defendant wrongfully induced the plaintiff’s father to abandon his family thereby (1) depriving the plaintiff of his father’s affection, companionship and guidance and (2) bringing unwanted attention and unwarranted publicity causing embarrassment, humiliation and loss of social standing to the plaintiff, is subject to demurrer on the ground that it fails to state a cause of action.

Judgments affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, Griffith and Herbert, JJ., concur. Gibson, J., dissenting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 Ohio Law Rep. 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kane-v-quigley-ohioctapp-1964.