Kane v. Quigley

Ohio Court of Appeals

Kane v. Quigley

29 Ohio Law Rep. 68

Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided December 29, 1964·No. 38584 and 38585·Published

Opinion

Appeals from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga Comity.

O’Neill, Judge.

A petition by a minor child, alleging that a defendant wrongfully induced the plaintiff’s father to abandon his family thereby (1) depriving the plaintiff of his father’s affection, companionship and guidance and (2) bringing unwanted attention and unwarranted publicity causing embarrassment, humiliation and loss of social standing to the plaintiff, is subject to demurrer on the ground that it fails to state a cause of action.

Judgments affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, Griffith and Herbert, JJ., concur. Gibson, J., dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga Comity.

O’Neill, Judge.

A petition by a minor child, alleging that a defendant wrongfully induced the plaintiff’s father to abandon his family thereby (1) depriving the plaintiff of his father’s affection, companionship and guidance and (2) bringing unwanted attention and unwarranted publicity causing embarrassment, humiliation and loss of social standing to the plaintiff, is subject to demurrer on the ground that it fails to state a cause of action.

Judgments affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, Griffith and Herbert, JJ., concur. Gibson, J., dissenting.

Kane v. Quigley, 29 Ohio Law Rep. 68 (Ohio Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

29 Ohio Law Rep. 68 (Kane v. Quigley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.