Kane v. Preston
24 Miss. 133
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
In this case, the lessor of the plaintiff, to show title in himself, offered as evidence a sheriff’s deed and a venditioni exponas, by virtue of which the property was sold; from which it appeared that the sale was made after the return day of the writ. On motion, the court rejected them. In this, there was no error.- In the case of Lehr v. Rogers, 3 S. & M. 468, it was [134] held, that a sale of real estate under an execution after its return day, is void.
Let the judgment be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kane v. Preston, 24 Miss. 133 (Mich. Ct. App. 1852).
24 Miss. 133 (Kane v. Preston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Faull v. Cooke
26 P. 662 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1890)