Kane v. Platt

193 S.W.3d 835, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 884, 2006 WL 1677858
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 20, 2006·No. No. ED 86748·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cherie Kane f/k/a Cherie Bull (“Mother”) appeals from a Judgment of Modification entered by the Circuit Court of Franklin County. In her appeal, Mother contends that the motion court erred when it based its finding of a substantial and continuing change in circumstance on Mother’s alleged failure to properly notify Father of Child’s relocation.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The judgment is supported by substantial and com[836] petent evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no prec-edential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kane v. Platt, 193 S.W.3d 835, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 884, 2006 WL 1677858 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

193 S.W.3d 835 (Kane v. Platt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. Carron
536 S.W.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1976)