Kane v. Holland Township

Supreme Court of Kansas

Kane v. Holland Township

132 P. 208, 89 Kan. 607, 1913 Kan. LEXIS 82

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedMay 10, 1913

DocketNo. 18,164

StatusPublished

This text of 132 P. 208 (Kane v. Holland Township) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kane v. Holland Township, 132 P. 208, 89 Kan. 607, 1913 Kan. LEXIS 82 (kan 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The contract involved in this case created an agency for the disposition of the defendant’s railroad stock but not an exclusive agency or a general power to control its disposition. The defendant still had the right to make an independent sale without consulting or notifying the plaintiff. Since the plaintiff failed to effect a disposition of the stock nothing was received through his efforts and he earned nothing.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The contract involved in this case created an agency for the disposition of the defendant’s railroad stock but not an exclusive agency or a general power to control its disposition. The defendant still had the right to make an independent sale without consulting or notifying the plaintiff. Since the plaintiff failed to effect a disposition of the stock nothing was received through his efforts and he earned nothing.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 P. 208, 89 Kan. 607, 1913 Kan. LEXIS 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kane-v-holland-township-kan-1913.