Kane v. Fleischer
This text of 248 A.D. 554 (Kane v. Fleischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The action is (1) for a permanent injunction restraining defendants from using, without plaintiff’s consent, any pictorial representation of plaintiff in moving pictures or so-called animated cartoons, or otherwise, particularly the pictorial representation called “ Betty Boop,” for the purposes of trade or advertising, and for an injunction pendente lite; (2) to enjoin defendants from unfair competition; and (3) for alleged damages. During the course of the trial the complaint was dismissed as to the individual defendant, Max Fleischer. Judgment entered on a decision dismissing the complaint on the merits unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 A.D. 554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kane-v-fleischer-nyappdiv-1936.