Kane v. D'Orazio

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Kane v. D'Orazio

110 A.2d 249, 380 Pa. 358, 1955 Pa. LEXIS 573

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 7, 1955·No. Appeal, No. 326·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam,

The fundamental issues in this case are factual. Since the findings are supported by the evidence and were confirmed by the court en banc, they are binding upon us. As a consequence, the legal question, which the appellant advances, is not germane to the present record. The opinion of the late President Judge Smith for the court below fully justifies that court’s findings and conclusions.

Decree affirmed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Pee Cueiam,

The fundamental issues in this case are factual. Since the findings are supported by the evidence and were confirmed by the court en banc, they are binding upon us. As a consequence, the legal question, which the appellant advances, is not germane to the present record. The opinion of the late President Judge Smith for the court below fully justifies that court’s findings and conclusions.

Decree affirmed at appellant’s costs.

Kane v. D'Orazio, 110 A.2d 249, 380 Pa. 358, 1955 Pa. LEXIS 573 (Pa. 1955).

Pincite

110 A.2d 249 (Kane v. D'Orazio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related