Kane v. Connell
This text of 175 A.D. 948 (Kane v. Connell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The injunction order appears to have been granted without any security, and no provision is made for security in the order. (See Code Civ. Proc. § 620; Howley v. Francis Press, 127 App. Div. 646; Feller v. Kronowitz, 137 id. 896.) The order is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with costs. This is, however, without prejudice to renewing this motion at Special Term with a proper undertaking under Code of Civil Procedure, section 620. Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
175 A.D. 948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kane-v-connell-nyappdiv-1916.