Kane-Dabu v. Dabu

297 A.D.2d 815, 747 N.Y.2d 809, 747 N.Y.S.2d 809, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8944

This text of 297 A.D.2d 815 (Kane-Dabu v. Dabu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kane-Dabu v. Dabu, 297 A.D.2d 815, 747 N.Y.2d 809, 747 N.Y.S.2d 809, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8944 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

The Family Court, although, in effect, finding that it had jurisdiction, providently exercised its discretion in determining that New York is an inconvenient forum for resolution of the issues raised in the proceeding (see Domestic Relations Law § 75-h).

[816]*816The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J.P., Goldstein, H. Miller and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 75
New York DOM § 75

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 A.D.2d 815, 747 N.Y.2d 809, 747 N.Y.S.2d 809, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kane-dabu-v-dabu-nyappdiv-2002.