Kandy Lynn Antrikin v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 28, 2007
Docket07-07-00324-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Kandy Lynn Antrikin v. State (Kandy Lynn Antrikin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kandy Lynn Antrikin v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

NO. 07-07-0324-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

SEPTEMBER 28, 2007 ______________________________

KANDY LYNN ANTRIKIN, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE _________________________________

FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

NO. 16518-C; HONORABLE ANA ESTEVEZ, JUDGE _______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Kandy Lynn Antrikin, appeals from an adjudication of her guilt for the

offense of possession and transport of certain chemicals with intent to manufacture a

controlled substance. No certification of defendant’s right to appeal has been executed by

the trial court regarding the adjudication.1 By letter dated July 25, 2007, this court notified

1 A certification of defendant’s right of appeal indicating that appellant had no right to appeal and had waived the same is included in the clerk’s record. However, by the date upon which this certification was signed, it could only apply to the order placing appellant on deferred adjudication probation and not to the adjudication proceeding. See TEX . R. APP. P. 25.2 cmt. (Trial court shall certify defendant’s right of appeal in every case in which judgment or other appealable order is entered). appellant, her appellate counsel, and the trial court that no certification of defendant’s right

of appeal had been filed. Further, this letter indicated that if certification was not filed

within 30 days of the letter, this court may dismiss the appeal.

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) requires dismissal of an appeal from a

criminal conviction in the absence of a certification showing the defendant’s right of appeal.

As this court has not received such a certification, we dismiss the appeal.

Mackey K. Hancock Justice

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kandy Lynn Antrikin v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kandy-lynn-antrikin-v-state-texapp-2007.