Kandur v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Kandur v. State

715 S.W.2d 449, 290 Ark. 69, 1986 Ark. LEXIS 2202

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided September 29, 1986·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record in case CR 84-21 from the Yell Circuit Court was tendered late, because an order extending the time was not filed. The attorney for appellant, Dale W. Finley, admits responsibility for the oversight. That admission on the part of counsel constitutes good cause for granting the motion. Per Curiam Order of Feb. 5,1979,265 Ark. 964. The motion for a rule on the clerk is accordingly granted.

A copy of this order will be sent to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The record in case CR 84-21 from the Yell Circuit Court was tendered late, because an order extending the time was not filed. The attorney for appellant, Dale W. Finley, admits responsibility for the oversight. That admission on the part of counsel constitutes good cause for granting the motion. Per Curiam Order of Feb. 5,1979,265 Ark. 964. The motion for a rule on the clerk is accordingly granted.

A copy of this order will be sent to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Kandur v. State, 715 S.W.2d 449, 290 Ark. 69, 1986 Ark. LEXIS 2202 (Ark. 1986).

Pincite

715 S.W.2d 449 (Kandur v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.