Kandice Dingey v. State
This text of Kandice Dingey v. State (Kandice Dingey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
KANDICE DINGEY,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D16-3326
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed February 10, 2017
3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County, Richard A. Howard, Judge.
Kandice Dingey, Quincy, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah A. Chance, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals the order summarily denying her motion for postconviction relief
filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In the motion, she alleged two
grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court properly addressed claim
one but did not address the second claim. The second claim alleges that Appellant’s attorney was ineffective for failing to move to suppress her confession based on the
argument that she was too intoxicated to waive her constitutional rights properly.
We affirm as to claim one. Because the trial court failed to address claim two, we
reverse that part of the order summarily denying that claim and remand this case for
attachment of the record that refutes the claim or for an evidentiary hearing.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.
SAWAYA, BERGER, and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kandice Dingey v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kandice-dingey-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.