Kanazeh v. Crosson

56 F. App'x 618
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 10, 2003·No. Nos. 02-2096, 02-2260, 02-2261, 02-2402·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Afaf Ka-nazeh appeals district court orders granting the Appellees’ motions to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and the district court orders and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Kanazeh v. Priepeton, No. CA-02-1083-A (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 2, 2002, entered Aug. 5, 2002; filed Aug. 30, 2002, entered Sept. 3, 2002; entered Oct. 21, 2002; filed Nov. 1, 2002, entered Nov. 4, 2002). We deny motions to strike filed in Nos. 02-2096 and 02-2260, the motion for appointment of counsel filed [619] in No. 02-2096, and the motion for general relief seeking to add a new party filed in all appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kanazeh v. Crosson, 56 F. App'x 618 (4th Cir. 2003).

56 F. App'x 618 (Kanazeh v. Crosson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.