Kanaley v. Brennan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kanaley v. Brennan

120 A.D.2d 974, 502 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 57082

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 23, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 120 A.D.2d 974 (Kanaley v. Brennan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kanaley v. Brennan, 120 A.D.2d 974, 502 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 57082 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Memorandum: We affirm for the reasons that the developers failed to submit a site development plan with sufficient dimensional information to permit the Planning Board to determine that [975]*975the proposal meets lot size and density requirements (see, Town Law § 281 [b]) and that the Board failed to make a reasoned elaboration of the basis for its negative declaration (see, H.O.M.E.S. v New York State Urban Dev. Corp., 69 AD2d 222, 232). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Roy, J. — art 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Pine and Balio, JJ. [119 Mise 2d 1003.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Memorandum: We affirm for the reasons that the developers failed to submit a site development plan with sufficient dimensional information to permit the Planning Board to determine that [975]*975the proposal meets lot size and density requirements (see, Town Law § 281 [b]) and that the Board failed to make a reasoned elaboration of the basis for its negative declaration (see, H.O.M.E.S. v New York State Urban Dev. Corp., 69 AD2d 222, 232). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Roy, J. — art 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Pine and Balio, JJ. [119 Mise 2d 1003.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 A.D.2d 974, 502 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 57082, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kanaley-v-brennan-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack