Kanaley v. Brennan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kanaley v. Brennan

120 A.D.2d 974, 502 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 57082

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 23, 1986·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Memorandum: We affirm for the reasons that the developers failed to submit a site development plan with sufficient dimensional information to permit the Planning Board to determine that [975] the proposal meets lot size and density requirements (see, Town Law § 281 [b]) and that the Board failed to make a reasoned elaboration of the basis for its negative declaration (see, H.O.M.E.S. v New York State Urban Dev. Corp., 69 AD2d 222, 232). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Roy, J. — art 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Pine and Balio, JJ. [119 Mise 2d 1003.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Memorandum: We affirm for the reasons that the developers failed to submit a site development plan with sufficient dimensional information to permit the Planning Board to determine that [975] the proposal meets lot size and density requirements (see, Town Law § 281 [b]) and that the Board failed to make a reasoned elaboration of the basis for its negative declaration (see, H.O.M.E.S. v New York State Urban Dev. Corp., 69 AD2d 222, 232). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Roy, J. — art 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Pine and Balio, JJ. [119 Mise 2d 1003.]

Kanaley v. Brennan, 120 A.D.2d 974, 502 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 57082 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

120 A.D.2d 974 (Kanaley v. Brennan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related