Kanaan v. Osborne

950 So. 2d 1291, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4560, 2007 WL 914680
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 28, 2007
DocketNo. 2D06-5584
StatusPublished

This text of 950 So. 2d 1291 (Kanaan v. Osborne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kanaan v. Osborne, 950 So. 2d 1291, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4560, 2007 WL 914680 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

WHATLEY, Judge.

Elias Kanaan, M.D., filed this petition for writ of certiorari seeking to quash a circuit court order which compelled him to provide notes that he, claims are exempt from discovery pursuant to section 766.205(4), Florida Statutes (2005).1 The respondent, Jimmy D. Osborne, correctly concedes that the notes are exempt from discovery pursuant to this court’s holding in Grimshaw v. Schwegel, 572 So.2d 12 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

Accordingly, we grant Kanaan’s petition for writ of certiorari, quash the circuit court’s order, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

NORTHCUTT and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grimshaw v. Schwegel
572 So. 2d 12 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
950 So. 2d 1291, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4560, 2007 WL 914680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kanaan-v-osborne-fladistctapp-2007.