Kamtech, Inc. v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided December 18, 2002·No. 01-1558·Published

Opinion

5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,21 3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH 

(/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS 3 WK &LU )LOH 1DPH DS

81,7('67$7(6&28572)$33($/6 )257+(6,;7+&,5&8,7 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

.$07(&+ ,1& ; 3HWLWLRQHU    1RV Y  !  1$7,21$/ /$%25 5(/$7,216  %2$5'  5HVSRQGHQW   ,17(51$7,21$/   %527+(5+22' 2)  %2,/(50$.(56 ,521 6+,3  %8,/'(56 %/$&.60,7+  )25*(56 $1' +(/3(56 $)/  &,2  ,QWHUYHQRU   1 2Q3HWLWLRQIRU5HYLHZIURPWKH'HFLVLRQRIWKH1DWLRQDO /DERU5HODWLRQV%RDUG 1RV&$&$ 6XEPLWWHG$XJXVW

  .DPWHFK,QFY1/5% 1RV 1RV .DPWHFK,QFY1/5% 

'HFLGHGDQG)LOHG6HSWHPEHU GLVSXWHVZKHQVZRUQWHVWLPRQ\LVRIIHUHGRQERWKVLGHVRIDQ LVVXH  6HH 3LNHYLOOH 8QLWHG 0HWKRGLVW +RVS  )G DW %HIRUH.(,7+DQG'$8*+75(<&LUFXLWsXGJHV  Q 7RQ\ 6FRWW 7UXFNLQJ  )G DW  &$55'LVWULFWsXGJH

&RQVHTXHQWO\ GHVSLWH .DPWHFKjV FODLPV ZH GHFOLQH WR RYHUWXUQVXFKFRQFOXVLRQV BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB ,QDILQDODOOHJDWLRQRIHUURU.DPWHFKLQVLVWVWKDWWKH%RDUG &2816(/ HUUHG LQ mUXEEHUVWDPSLQJl WKH DGPLQLVWUDWLYH ODZ MXGJHjV FRQFOXVLRQ RI ODZ WKDW WKH FRPSDQ\ YLRODWHG WKH $FW E\ 21 %5,()  0HUHGLWK / sDVRQ 1$7,21$/ /$%25 m>L@QIRUPLQJ HPSOR\HHV WKDW WKHLU DSSOLFDWLRQV IRU 5(/$7,216%2$5':DVKLQJWRQ'&IRU5HVSRQGHQW HPSOR\PHQWZRXOGQRWEHFRQVLGHUHGEHFDXVHRIWKHLUXQLRQ (ULF.6PLWK/,77/(50(1'(/621$WODQWD*HRUJLD DIILOLDWLRQl$FFRUGLQJWRWKHUHVSRQGHQWWKHDGPLQLVWUDWLYH IRU3HWLWLRQHU0LFKDHOs6WDSS%/$.( 8+/,*.DQVDV ODZ MXGJH mIDLOHG WR LGHQWLI\ WKH HYLGHQFH XSRQ ZKLFK KH &LW\.DQVDVIRU,QWHUYHQRU EDVHG KLV FRQFOXVLRQ DQG GLG QRW DGGUHVV WKLV DOOHJDWLRQ DQ\ZKHUHLQKLVGHFLVLRQl BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB &RQWUDU\ WR .DPWHFKjV DVVHUWLRQ KRZHYHU WKH 23,1,21 DGPLQLVWUDWLYHODZMXGJHGLGLQGHHGGLVFXVVWKHEDVLVIRUWKLV BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB ILQGLQJDQGFRQFOXVLRQ7KHUHIHUHQFHWR.DPWHFKjVDFWRI LQIRUPLQJ HPSOR\HHV WKDW SHUVRQV ZLWK XQLRQ RUJDQL]LQJ 0$57+$ &5$,* '$8*+75(< &LUFXLW sXGJH  7KH FUHGHQWLDOVZRXOGQRWEHFRQVLGHUHGIRUHPSOR\PHQWFOHDUO\ SHWLWLRQHULQWKLVGLVSXWH.DPWHFK,QFVHHNVUHYLHZRIDQ UHIHUVWRWKHFRPPHQWVPDGHE\IRUHPDQ2NLH/DFH\WR5LFN\ RUGHU RI WKH 1DWLRQDO /DERU 5HODWLRQV %RDUG GLUHFWLQJ &R[LQ+DZHVYLOOHFRPPHQWVGLVFXVVHGE\WKHDGPLQLVWUDWLYH .DPWHFKWRUHIUDLQIURPQXPHURXVDFWVIRXQGWRKDYHEHHQ ODZMXGJHDWOHQJWKLQKLVGHFLVLRQ)XUWKHUPRUHDOWKRXJKWKH FRPPLWWHG LQ YLRODWLRQ RI WKH SURYLVLRQV RI WKH 1DWLRQDO FRPSDQ\DUJXHVWKDW&R[jVWHVWLPRQ\LQWKLVUHJDUGVKRXOG /DERU5HODWLRQV$FW86&††WRUHLQVWDWHRQH QRW EH EHOLHYHG WKH DGPLQLVWUDWLYH ODZ MXGJH ZDV DJDLQ HPSOR\HH WHUPLQDWHG IURP WKH FRPSDQ\ DQG WR RIIHU D SODFHG LQ D SRVLWLRQ RI PDNLQJ D GHWHUPLQDWLRQ RI WKH ZHOGLQJWHVWWRDQRWKHUIRUPHUHPSOR\HH7KH%RDUGKDVILOHG FUHGLELOLW\RIWKHZLWQHVVHVDQGFKRVHWRILQGWKDW&R[ZDVQRW DFURVVDSSOLFDWLRQVHHNLQJHQIRUFHPHQWRILWVRUGHU)RUWKH O\LQJLQPDNLQJWKHVWDWHPHQWVFUHGLWHGE\WKHILQGHURIIDFW UHDVRQVVHWRXWEHORZZHRUGHUHQIRUFHPHQWRIWKH%RDUGjV RUGHU &21&/86,21 )RUWKHUHDVRQVVHWRXWDERYHZHFRQFOXGHWKDWVXEVWDQWLDO HYLGHQFHVXSSRUWVWKH%RDUGjVILQGLQJVDQGWKDWWKH%RDUGjV UHTXHVWIRUHQIRUFHPHQWRILWVRUGHUPXVWEH*5$17(':H

IXUWKHUFRQFOXGHWKDW.DPWHFKjVSHWLWLRQIRUUHYLHZPXVWEH '(1,(' 7KLV GHFLVLRQ ZDV RULJLQDOO\ LVVXHG DV DQ mXQSXEOLVKHG GHFLVLRQl ILOHG RQ 6HSWHPEHU   2Q 'HFHPEHU   WKH FRXUW GHVLJQDWHG WKH RSLQLRQ DV RQH UHFRPPHQGHG IRU IXOOWH[W SXEOLFDWLRQ

7KH +RQRUDEOH sDPHV * &DUU 8QLWHG 6WDWHV 'LVWULFW sXGJH IRU WKH 1RUWKHUQ 'LVWULFW RI 2KLR VLWWLQJ E\ GHVLJQDWLRQ  .DPWHFK,QFY1/5% 1RV 1RV .DPWHFK,QFY1/5% 

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kamtech, Inc. v. NLRB, (6th Cir. 2002).

Kamtech, Inc. v. NLRB (Kamtech, Inc. v. NLRB) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.