Kamps & Sacksteder Drug Co. v. United Drug Co.

160 N.W. 271, 164 Wis. 412, 1916 Wisc. LEXIS 93
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 5, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 160 N.W. 271 (Kamps & Sacksteder Drug Co. v. United Drug Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kamps & Sacksteder Drug Co. v. United Drug Co., 160 N.W. 271, 164 Wis. 412, 1916 Wisc. LEXIS 93 (Wis. 1916).

Opinion

WiNsnow, O. J.

In this case it is held:

1. Where one party to an executory contract repudiates it, or puts it out of his power to perform it, the other party may at his option treat it as terminated at once. Merrick v. Northwestern Nat. L. Ins. Co. 124 Wis. 221, 102 N. W. 593; Woodman v. Blue Grass L. Co. 125 Wis. 489, 103 N. W. 236, 104 N. W. 920.

[415]*4152. The involuntary bankruptcy of a party disables'bim from performing bis executory business contracts and is regarded in tbe law as tbe equivalent of a voluntary act, inasmuch as it is tbe result of acts or omissions of tbe bankrupt bimself; benee it follows tbat sucb contracts may at once be treated by tbe other party as terminated. Central T. Co. v. Chicago A. Asso. 240 U. S. 581, 86 Sup. Ct. 412.

3. Sharing in a dividend or joining in a composition proceeding does not interfere with this right.

4. In tbe present case it appears.tbat tbe defendant at once notified tbe plaintiff tbat tbe agency would not be reopened except upon compliance with certain conditions and this amounts to an unequivocal declaration tbat tbe contract was terminated.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harvey v. Grossman
148 F.2d 119 (Seventh Circuit, 1945)
Herde v. Estate of Williams
283 N.W. 805 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1939)
Johnston v. Grimm
229 N.W. 716 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1930)
Checkeway v. Pejepscot Paper Co.
146 A. 244 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1929)
Washburn-Crosby Co. v. Kubiak
185 N.W. 162 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 N.W. 271, 164 Wis. 412, 1916 Wisc. LEXIS 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kamps-sacksteder-drug-co-v-united-drug-co-wis-1916.