Kampe v. State

320 S.W.3d 218, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1285, 2010 WL 3812441
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 7, 2010·No. WD 70644·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Jamie Kampe appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction motion. He says his plea counsel failed to litigate a motion to suppress that would have been meritorious and resulted in all incriminating evidence being suppressed. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kampe v. State, 320 S.W.3d 218, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1285, 2010 WL 3812441 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

320 S.W.3d 218 (Kampe v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Wilkerson
320 S.W.3d 218 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)