Kamp v. Tiffany Knits, Inc.

79 Misc. 2d 239, 360 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1973 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1275
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedDecember 12, 1973
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 79 Misc. 2d 239 (Kamp v. Tiffany Knits, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kamp v. Tiffany Knits, Inc., 79 Misc. 2d 239, 360 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1973 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1275 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Opinion

Memorandum. Orders reversed, without costs, and plaintiff’s motion granted.

Plaintiff is entitled over the adverse party’s objection ,to conduct an examination before trial with the aid of a tape recorder (Catapano v. Shapiro, 6 A D 2d 1054). However, due to the present state of technological development in regard to possible tampering, we impose the following conditions and restrictions on its use:

(1) The testimony must be transcribed and submitted to the witness within 30 days and then corrected, approved and executed by him.
(2) Upon trial, the recording disc or tape may not be produced, used or offered in evidence.
(3) Only the signed examination before trial may be used at thé trial.
(4) Defendant may simultaneously record the testimony on a device of his own choice.

Margett, P. J., and Schwartzwald, J., concur; Rinaldi, J., taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kamp v. Schier
75 A.D.2d 638 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 Misc. 2d 239, 360 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1973 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kamp-v-tiffany-knits-inc-nyappterm-1973.