Kamp v. Grantham

Missouri Court of Appeals

Kamp v. Grantham

963 S.W.2d 350, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 2199, 1997 WL 792315

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kamp v. Grantham. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1855 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 30, 1997·No. No. 72459·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sublessees appeal the judgment entered granting sublessors’ claim for money owed them under a sublease. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on [351]*351appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sublessees appeal the judgment entered granting sublessors’ claim for money owed them under a sublease. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on [351]*351appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Kamp v. Grantham, 963 S.W.2d 350, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 2199, 1997 WL 792315 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

963 S.W.2d 350 (Kamp v. Grantham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.