Kammer v. Lutz
This text of 234 A.D. 817 (Kammer v. Lutz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Sears, P. and Thompson, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the facts, on the ground that finding No. 11 contained in the decision is against the weight of the evidence and that the refusal to find defendants’ proposed findings Nos. 10 and 12 is against the weight of the evidence. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 A.D. 817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kammer-v-lutz-nyappdiv-1931.