Kaminsky v. Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, WFUBMC

Fourth Circuit

Kaminsky v. Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, WFUBMC

410 F. App'x 609

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 8, 2011

DocketNo. 10-1842

StatusPublished

This text of 410 F. App'x 609 (Kaminsky v. Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, WFUBMC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kaminsky v. Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, WFUBMC, 410 F. App'x 609 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard A. Kaminsky appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by [610]*610the district court. Kaminsky v. Wake Forest Univ. Baptist Med. Ctr., WFUBMC, No. 1:08-cv-00882-JAB-PTS, 2010 WL 2583513 (M.D.N.C. July 19, 2010). We deny as moot Kaminsky’s motion to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard A. Kaminsky appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by [610]*610the district court. Kaminsky v. Wake Forest Univ. Baptist Med. Ctr., WFUBMC, No. 1:08-cv-00882-JAB-PTS, 2010 WL 2583513 (M.D.N.C. July 19, 2010). We deny as moot Kaminsky’s motion to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

410 F. App'x 609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaminsky-v-wake-forest-university-baptist-medical-center-wfubmc-ca4-2011.