Kaminsky v. Saint Louis University School of Medicine

226 F. App'x 646
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJune 26, 2007
Docket06-3139
StatusUnpublished

This text of 226 F. App'x 646 (Kaminsky v. Saint Louis University School of Medicine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kaminsky v. Saint Louis University School of Medicine, 226 F. App'x 646 (8th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dr. Richard Kaminsky appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12112(a), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-17, suit against Saint Louis University School of Medicine (SLU). Upon careful de novo review, see Ferguson v. United States, 484 F.3d 1068, 1072 (8th Cir.2007), we find no reversible error of fact or law. Even if Dr. Kamin *647 sky had been able to establish a prima facie case of discrimination, SLU proffered sufficient nondiscriminatory reasons for its actions that Dr. Kaminsky failed to rebut as pretextual. See Freeman v. Fahey, 374 F.3d 663, 666 (8th Cir.2004). Accordingly, we affirm based upon the district court’s well-reasoned and thorough order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
226 F. App'x 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaminsky-v-saint-louis-university-school-of-medicine-ca8-2007.