Kaminker v. Kaminker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kaminker v. Kaminker

124 A.D.2d 786, 508 N.Y.S.2d 979, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62105

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 24, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 124 A.D.2d 786 (Kaminker v. Kaminker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kaminker v. Kaminker, 124 A.D.2d 786, 508 N.Y.S.2d 979, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62105 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) requires that "[i]n any decision made pursuant to this subdivision, the court shall set forth the factors it considered and the reasons for its decision and such may not be waived by either party or counsel” (Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6] [b]; Paolini v Paolini, 99 AD2d 742, mod on remittal 100 AD2d 868). In this matter, the court adequately set forth the factors it considered in making its award of maintenance in the sum of $10,000 per year for an eight-year period and the reasons for its decision. We have examined the plaintiff’s contentions and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) requires that "[i]n any decision made pursuant to this subdivision, the court shall set forth the factors it considered and the reasons for its decision and such may not be waived by either party or counsel” (Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6] [b]; Paolini v Paolini, 99 AD2d 742, mod on remittal 100 AD2d 868). In this matter, the court adequately set forth the factors it considered in making its award of maintenance in the sum of $10,000 per year for an eight-year period and the reasons for its decision. We have examined the plaintiff’s contentions and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 A.D.2d 786, 508 N.Y.S.2d 979, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaminker-v-kaminker-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack