Kamin v. City of New York
This text of 297 A.D.2d 573 (Kamin v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[574]*574While plaintiff clearly suffers from chronic and painful conditions for which she had surgery and other treatment after the subject elevator accident, ample evidence shows that such conditions are due to a preexisting congenital and degenerative disease in plaintiffs spine. A fair interpretation of the conflicting evidence on causation supports the jury’s apparent finding that while the accident caused plaintiff some pain and suffering, it did not permanently aggravate her preexisting conditions or result in any serious new injuries (cf Grassi v Ulrich, 87 NY2d 954). Concur — Williams, P.J., Tom, Rosenberger and Friedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
297 A.D.2d 573, 747 N.Y.2d 166, 747 N.Y.S.2d 166, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kamin-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2002.