Kamilche Company Simpson Redwood Co. v. United States

75 F.3d 1391, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 800, 96 Daily Journal DAR 1240, 77 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 816, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 1517, 1996 WL 49942
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 5, 1996·No. 93-15768·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The opinion cited at 53 F.3d 1059 (9th Cir.1995), is hereby amended as follows:

At 53 F.3d 1064, before the word “REVERSED,” the following paragraph is added:

In its petition for rehearing, the government reminds us that Simpson received a benefit in the amount of $300,000.00 as part of the transaction in which it dis-. claimed its interest and contests whether donative intent has been established to that extent. If the fair market value of the donated property exceeds the value of the property received in return, the taxpayer has the requisite donative intent for the excess value. conveyed. United States v. American Bar Endowment, 477 U.S. 105, 118, 106 S.Ct. 2426, 2433-34, 91 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986). Simpson concedes, and we so hold, that its tax deduction must be reduced to that extent, i.e. to $13,800,000.00, based on the stipulated record.

Except as granted to the above extent, the petition for rehearing is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kamilche Company Simpson Redwood Co. v. United States, 75 F.3d 1391, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 800, 96 Daily Journal DAR 1240, 77 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 816, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 1517, 1996 WL 49942 (9th Cir. 1996).

75 F.3d 1391 (Kamilche Company Simpson Redwood Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kleidman v. Murphy
N.D. California, 2023
United States v. Maricopa
151 F. Supp. 3d 998 (D. Arizona, 2015)
Dunkle v. Dale
58 F. Supp. 3d 959 (D. Alaska, 2014)
Alberto-Culver Co. v. Trevive, Inc.
199 F. Supp. 2d 1004 (C.D. California, 2002)
Pool Water Products v. Olin Corp.
258 F.3d 1024 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)