Kamilche Company Simpson Redwood Co. v. United States
75 F.3d 1391, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 800, 96 Daily Journal DAR 1240, 77 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 816, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 1517, 1996 WL 49942
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 5, 1996
Docket93-15768
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases
This text of 75 F.3d 1391 (Kamilche Company Simpson Redwood Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kamilche Company Simpson Redwood Co. v. United States, 75 F.3d 1391, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 800, 96 Daily Journal DAR 1240, 77 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 816, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 1517, 1996 WL 49942 (9th Cir. 1996).
Opinion
ORDER
The opinion cited at 53 F.3d 1059 (9th Cir.1995), is hereby amended as follows:
At 53 F.3d 1064, before the word “REVERSED,” the following paragraph is added:
In its petition for rehearing, the government reminds us that Simpson received a benefit in the amount of $300,000.00 as part of the transaction in which it dis-. claimed its interest and contests whether donative intent has been established to that extent. If the fair market value of the donated property exceeds the value of the property received in return, the taxpayer has the requisite donative intent for the excess value. conveyed. United States v. American Bar Endowment, 477 U.S. 105, 118, 106 S.Ct. 2426, 2433-34, 91 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986). Simpson concedes, and we so hold, that its tax deduction must be reduced to that extent, i.e. to $13,800,000.00, based on the stipulated record.
Except as granted to the above extent, the petition for rehearing is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kleidman v. Murphy
N.D. California, 2023
United States v. Maricopa
151 F. Supp. 3d 998 (D. Arizona, 2015)
Dunkle v. Dale
58 F. Supp. 3d 959 (D. Alaska, 2014)
Alberto-Culver Co. v. Trevive, Inc.
199 F. Supp. 2d 1004 (C.D. California, 2002)
Pool Water Products v. Olin Corp.
258 F.3d 1024 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
Resolution Trust Corporation v. Charles H. Keating, Jr., Resolution Trust Corporation v. Mary Elaine Keating Charles H. Keating, Jr.
186 F.3d 1110 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
75 F.3d 1391, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 800, 96 Daily Journal DAR 1240, 77 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 816, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 1517, 1996 WL 49942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kamilche-company-simpson-redwood-co-v-united-states-ca9-1996.