Kamil v. Schram
This text of 86 F.2d 1003 (Kamil v. Schram) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon reading and filing the stipulation of the parties hereto and the court being fully advised in the premises,
On motion of Hiram Y. Popkin, attorney for the plaintiffs,
It is ordered that the appeal heretofore taken in the above-entitled cause be docketed and dismissed with prejudice to either of the parties hereto and without further cost to either of the parties hereto.
It is further' ordered that Elmer W. Voorhies, clerk of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, return to Leonard Simons, co-counsel for the plaintiffs herein, the cash bond heretofore deposited with the said clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
86 F.2d 1003, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kamil-v-schram-ca6-1936.