Kamerman v. Solomon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kamerman v. Solomon

52 A.D.2d 579, 382 N.Y.S.2d 528, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12154

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 5, 1976·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover on seven promissory notes, the defendant appeals (by permission) from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court for the Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts, dated May 29, 1975, which reversed, on the facts, a judgment of the Justice Court, Town of Mamaroneck, County of Westchester, entered August 6, 1974, in favor of defendant, and granted judgment to plaintiff for the full amount of his claim. Order affirmed, with costs. The record amply supports the determination of the Appellate Term. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover on seven promissory notes, the defendant appeals (by permission) from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court for the Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts, dated May 29, 1975, which reversed, on the facts, a judgment of the Justice Court, Town of Mamaroneck, County of Westchester, entered August 6, 1974, in favor of defendant, and granted judgment to plaintiff for the full amount of his claim. Order affirmed, with costs. The record amply supports the determination of the Appellate Term. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur.

Kamerman v. Solomon, 52 A.D.2d 579, 382 N.Y.S.2d 528, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12154 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

52 A.D.2d 579 (Kamerman v. Solomon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.