Kamerman v. Pickard
10 A.D.2d 825, 200 N.Y.S.2d 348, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10639
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 12, 1960
StatusPublished
This text of 10 A.D.2d 825 (Kamerman v. Pickard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kamerman v. Pickard, 10 A.D.2d 825, 200 N.Y.S.2d 348, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10639 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. Plaintiff may renew the motion for discovery and inspection after the conclusion of the examination before trial upon a showing of the inadequacy of the examination. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, M. M. Prank, Yalente and McNally, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 A.D.2d 825, 200 N.Y.S.2d 348, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kamerman-v-pickard-nyappdiv-1960.