Kamerman v. Curtis

259 A.D. 878, 22 N.Y.S.2d 124, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7119

Opinion

Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ,; Martin, P, J„ dissents and votes to reverse and grant the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kamerman v. Curtis, 259 A.D. 878, 22 N.Y.S.2d 124, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7119 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

259 A.D. 878 (Kamerman v. Curtis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.